Sui.

Post

Share your knowledge.

article banner.
Owen.
Owen4662
Jul 25, 2025
Article

How Sui Achieves High Throughput with Parallel Execution and Sui Move

As blockchain applications grow in complexity and user demand, scalability has become one of the most pressing challenges in the Web3 ecosystem. Traditional blockchains like Ethereum process transactions sequentially, limiting throughput and increasing latency during peak usage. In response, next-generation platforms are rethinking the fundamentals of consensus and execution. Among them, Sui stands out by achieving exceptional throughput—capable of processing tens of thousands of transactions per second—thanks to its innovative combination of parallel execution and the Sui Move programming language. This article explores how Sui leverages these technologies to deliver unprecedented performance while maintaining security and decentralization.

The Bottleneck of Sequential Execution

Most blockchains operate on a sequential execution model: transactions are ordered in a block, and each is executed one after another. This approach ensures consistency but creates a bottleneck. Even if two transactions are completely independent (e.g., Alice sending tokens to Bob and Carol transferring an NFT to Dave), they must still wait their turn. This inefficiency limits scalability and increases user fees during congestion.

Sui addresses this limitation not by optimizing the same model, but by replacing it entirely with a parallel execution engine that can process thousands of non-conflicting transactions simultaneously.

The Foundation: Sui’s Object-Centric Architecture

The key to Sui’s performance lies in its object-centric data model. Unlike account-based blockchains where state is stored in global storage slots, Sui treats every digital asset as a unique object with a globally unique ID and explicit ownership. These objects—such as tokens, NFTs, or smart contract instances—are the primary units of data and computation.

Because each object has a clear owner and lifecycle, Sui can determine at runtime whether two transactions interact with the same data. If they don’t, they can be safely executed in parallel.

For example:

  • Transaction A transfers a coin owned by Alice.
  • Transaction B modifies an NFT owned by Bob.

Since these transactions operate on different objects with no shared state, Sui can execute them concurrently without risk of conflict. This fine-grained dependency tracking enables massive parallelization, especially for common operations like payments, social interactions, and NFT transfers.

Parallel Execution Engine: From Theory to Reality

Sui’s runtime uses a dependency-aware execution engine that analyzes transactions and schedules them for parallel processing. The process works as follows:

  1. Transaction Submission: Users submit transactions to Sui’s mempool, managed by the Narwhal transaction dissemination protocol.
  2. Dependency Analysis: The system identifies which objects each transaction reads or writes.
  3. Parallel Scheduling: Transactions with no overlapping object access are grouped and executed simultaneously across multiple CPU cores.
  4. Consensus on Outcomes: Sui’s consensus protocol, Tusk, finalizes the order of transactions, but execution happens before ordering—unlike most blockchains where execution follows ordering.

This “execute-then-order” model reduces latency and maximizes hardware utilization. In ideal conditions, Sui can achieve sub-second finality and sustain throughput far beyond traditional chains.

Sui Move: Enabling Safe Parallelism

While the architecture enables parallel execution, the Sui Move programming language ensures it’s done safely. Sui Move is a variant of the Move language, customized to support Sui’s object model and ownership rules.

Three key features of Sui Move make parallel execution both powerful and secure:

1. Ownership and Borrowing System

Sui Move enforces strict ownership semantics:

  • Objects can be owned, shared, or immutable.
  • Only the owner can transfer or delete an object.
  • Functions receive objects by value (transferring ownership) or by reference (borrowing).

This prevents race conditions: if a transaction owns an object, no other transaction can access it until the operation completes.

2. No Global State Conflicts

Unlike Solidity, where contracts share a global state space, Sui Move modules encapsulate data. Functions can only modify objects they explicitly receive as inputs. This eliminates hidden dependencies and makes conflict detection deterministic.

3. Dynamic Field Support

Sui Move allows objects to contain dynamic fields—key-value pairs that can be added at runtime. Even with this flexibility, the ownership model ensures that only authorized entities can modify specific fields, preserving safety in complex applications.

Together, these features allow the Sui runtime to statically verify that parallel transactions won’t interfere, reducing the need for locks or rollbacks.

Narwhal and Tusk: The Backbone of High Performance

Sui’s performance isn’t just about execution—it’s also about how transactions are disseminated and agreed upon.

  • Narwhal is a distributed mempool that decouples transaction gossip from consensus. Validators efficiently share transactions across the network, even under high load, preventing bottlenecks.
  • Tusk is a low-latency consensus protocol that finalizes transactions quickly, often in under a second, by leveraging Narwhal’s efficient data propagation.

This separation allows Sui to scale horizontally: adding more validators increases throughput without sacrificing speed, a critical advantage over monolithic consensus designs.

Real-World Performance and Use Cases

Sui’s architecture excels in scenarios with many independent transactions:

  • Gaming: Thousands of players can perform actions (e.g., buying items, leveling up) simultaneously.
  • Social Applications: Likes, comments, and follows can be processed in parallel.
  • Micropayments: High-frequency, low-value transactions scale efficiently.

Benchmarks show Sui achieving over 120,000 TPS in lab conditions, with real-world performance already surpassing 10,000 TPS on mainnet—orders of magnitude higher than Ethereum or Solana under similar workloads.

Security Without Sacrifice

High throughput doesn’t come at the cost of security. Sui maintains strong safety guarantees:

  • Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT): Consensus is secure against malicious validators.
  • Formal Verification: Sui Move supports tools for proving correctness of critical logic.
  • Deterministic Execution: All nodes compute the same outcome, ensuring consistency.

The combination of Move’s resource safety and Sui’s ownership model ensures that even at scale, assets cannot be duplicated, stolen, or corrupted.

Conclusion

Sui represents a paradigm shift in blockchain design. By rethinking the relationship between data, computation, and consensus, it achieves high throughput not through brute force, but through intelligent architecture. The synergy between Sui’s object-centric model, parallel execution engine, and Sui Move’s safety-first language design enables a new class of scalable, low-latency decentralized applications.

As Web3 moves beyond financial use cases toward social, gaming, and real-time interactions, platforms like Sui will be essential. With its ability to handle massive concurrency without sacrificing security or decentralization, Sui is not just fast—it’s built for the future of the internet.

  • Sui
  • Move
3
Share
Comments
.