When large token unlocks happen, trust really depends on how much visibility you as a holder have into what’s going on. The Sui Foundation’s reports help, but they can feel too infrequent or one-sided. To build stronger confidence, you’d want more frequent and independently verified audits so allocations and unlock schedules can’t be doubted. Adding real-time dashboards that show treasury movements directly on-chain would also give you continuous clarity instead of waiting for a quarterly update. Beyond transparency, giving the community a voice matters lightweight governance tools where token holders can signal preferences or even vote on how unlocked tokens are allocated create a sense of shared ownership. That way, reporting shifts from being a static PDF to a living, participatory process. You can dive deeper here: Sui Foundation transparency reports.

When it comes to trust, transparency is everything. You’ve probably noticed that large token unlocks can spark doubt, especially if holders feel blindsided or underinformed. Sui Foundation’s reporting is a step in the right direction because it gives you visibility into schedules and distributions, but it may not be enough on its own. What really builds lasting trust is a mix of frequent, verifiable updates, ideally backed by independent audits that confirm treasury allocations and spending. Pairing that with on-chain governance tools—like community voting on how unlocked tokens are allocated or at least community signaling—helps shift the process from one-way reporting into shared decision-making. For example, you could imagine a module where token holders can signal preferences:

public entry fun vote(proposal: &mut Proposal, voter: &signer, choice: u8) {
    let addr = signer::address_of(voter);
    assert!(proposal.has_not_voted(addr), EAlreadyVoted);
    proposal.record_vote(addr, choice);
}