What aspects of the original guide stand out to you as most essential for someone facing a delayed USDC transfer through Wormhole? Let’s explore rephrasing it together by breaking it down section by section. I’ll pose some questions to spark your thinking about alternative wording, structure, or emphasis, helping you uncover a fresh way to express these ideas. Feel free to reflect on each one and jot down your own versions—curiosity is key here! Starting with the introduction: The original opens by noting what to do if the bridge is stuck for over 30 minutes. How might we reword this to make it more inviting or proactive, perhaps framing it as an opportunity to diagnose the issue yourself? What words could replace “check and do” to encourage a sense of empowerment? Moving to the part about confirming both chain transactions: It describes Wormhole bridging as having two “legs”—a lock/burn on the source and a mint/redeem on the destination, suggesting the use of block explorers like Etherscan or Solscan. What if we thought about this as verifying a journey with two key stops? How could we rephrase it to highlight why confirming the first leg is crucial, using simpler analogies or fewer technical terms to aid understanding? Now, consider the section on checking Wormhole Explorer: It directs users to https://wormholescan.io, paste the transaction hash, and interpret statuses like “Awaiting VAA” or “VAA available.” Why do you think distinguishing these statuses is important? How might we re-express this to sound more like a detective process, perhaps emphasizing the website as a central “hub” for insights, and guiding the reader on what each status implies for next steps? On manually redeeming stuck transactions: The original explains using https://wormhole.com/manual-redemption, pasting the source TX hash, and approving the mint. What challenges might someone face here, and how could we rephrase this to stress patience and precision? Could we liken it to manually unlocking a door when the automatic one fails, to make the process feel more approachable? Regarding checking your connected wallet and network: It points out that a pending status might just stem from being on the wrong chain. How does this relate to common user errors in your view? What alternative phrasing could turn this into a quick “reality check,” perhaps encouraging users to double-check their setup before panicking? The verification of the token contract: This warns to ensure it’s the Wormhole-wrapped USDC, not the native one. Why is this distinction vital, and what confusion might arise without it? How might we reword this to include a gentle reminder about addresses, maybe framing it as confirming the “right version” of the asset to build confidence? If the VAA is delayed: It attributes this to guardian congestion, usually resolving in an hour, or chain-specific issues. What factors could cause such delays, based on your understanding? Could we rephrase this to foster optimism, like viewing it as a temporary traffic jam, while prompting users to monitor rather than worry? Contacting Wormhole support: The suggestion is to join their Discord and share the TX hash for insights on guardian or network issues. How does involving community support enhance troubleshooting? What rephrasing could make this feel more collaborative, perhaps highlighting it as tapping into expert knowledge when self-help reaches its limit? Finally, the advice to avoid re-bridging immediately: It cautions against double-locking funds. Why might impatience lead to complications here? How could we re-express this as a wise pause, emphasizing clarity in status before proceeding, to encourage thoughtful decision-making? You’ve got a strong foundation now—take a moment to weave your responses to these questions into a cohesive rephrased guide. What emerges when you connect them? I’m here if you’d like to share your version or explore any part further; learning through this process is truly rewarding!

You can resolve the issue by visiting the transaction resume page: Go to https://bridge.sui.io/bridge-usdc, then click on 'Resume Transaction'. Paste your transaction hash and confirm the action to try resolving the pending status. If that doesn't work, make sure that your transaction is actually stuck by checking the on-chain status or reaching out to the support team associated with Wormhole for further assistance.

A stuck Wormhole bridge transaction for USDC can often be resolved by checking the transaction status on both the source and destination block explorers (e.g., Etherscan for Ethereum, Suiscan for Sui). Delays may occur due to network congestion or validator confirmation times, especially during peak usage. Use Wormhole’s official tracker tool (https://wormhole.com) with your TX hash to identify the current stage—pending, attested, or completed. If stalled, contact Wormhole’s support via Discord with your transaction details for manual investigation, as they can often trigger reprocessing.

If your Wormhole bridge is stuck, try this:

1. Check Status – Use the Wormhole explorer with your TX ID.
2. Retry – Some bridges have a "retry" button in the app.
3. Contact Support – Reach out to Wormhole or Sui support with your transaction details.

Common Causes:

• Network congestion.
• Low gas on the destination chain.

Prevention:
✔ Always test with a small amount first.

(Most bridges resolve automatically—wait a bit longer before worrying.)

First, check the transaction hash on a block explorer for both the source and destination chains. This will tell you if it's still processing or if it failed.

If it's stuck but not failed, just give it more time. Bridge transactions can sometimes take an hour or more, especially if there's heavy network congestion. Don't try to resubmit it yet—you might create a bigger mess.

If it shows as failed, you'll usually need to retry the bridge. Some bridges have a 'retry' function built in. Otherwise, check Wormhole's official docs or support for their specific recovery process. I've found their portal usually has a transaction history section that can help.