Bridges are high-risk targets → Many of the largest crypto hacks came from bridge exploits. They often involve complex lock-and-mint mechanisms or wrapped assets, which expand the attack surface.

Third-party bridges (e.g., Wormhole, Celer, Router) offer convenience and multi-chain reach but depend on external relayers and smart contract security.

Native solutions (like Sui Bridge) rely on validator consensus, making them more trust-minimized but often limited in scope (e.g., fewer assets supported).

The trade-off is breadth vs safety: third-party bridges give more connectivity, while native solutions give stronger security assurances.

👉 In practice, most developers test with small amounts, verify bridge reputation, and prefer native interoperability when available.